1984 PLP 1299 (SCMR)
GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN — Petitioner Versus MOIZUDDIN AHMED — Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1299 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Shafiur Rahman and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ |
| Parties | GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN — Petitioner Versus MOIZUDDIN AHMED — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1299 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1299 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Shafiur Rahman and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1299 (SCMR) (GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN — Petitioner Versus MOIZUDDIN AHMED — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munawar Ahmad Mirza, Advocate General Baluchistan instructed by Muhammad Aslam Jan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner
- Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent
- Date of hearing 27th May, 1984
- Munawar Ahmad Mirza, Advocate General Baluchistan instructed by Muhammad Aslam Jan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner
- Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent
- 3. The learned Advocate‑General, Baluchistan, points out that although in the letter dated 24th March, 1974 the post of the Provincial Secretary is in Grade 20, but the minimum length of service for eligibility to that Grade as provided in that very letter is 15 years and that the respondent was not entitled to pay in NPS 20 until he completed the required length of service. Adverting to section 17 of the Civil Servants Act, he pointed out that even under that section entitlement to the pay sanctioned, for the post was not unconditional but subject to the rules.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, dated 16-11-1983 passed in Appeal No. 705(L) of 1982).
Art. 212--Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), S.17--Federal Govern ment Letter No.3/3/73-ARC II, dated 24-3-1974--Leave to appeal granted to examine contention that although in letter dated 24-3-1974, post of Provincial Secretary was in, Grade 20, but minimum length of service for eligibility to that grade as provided in that very letter was 15 years and that person was not entitled to pay in NPS 20 until he completed required length of service and even under S. 17, Civil Servants Act 1973 entitlement to pay sanctioned for post was not unconditional but subject to Rules.
Judgment & Decree
Munawar Ahmad Mirza, Advocate General Baluchistan instructed by Muhammad Aslam Jan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent Date of hearing 27th May, 1984 M.S.H. QURAISHI, J. ‑‑ According to the office report, the petition is late by two days. In the application moved under Order XXXIII of this Court's Rules, it has been submitted that the order of the Tribunal having been communicated on 11th December, 1983 and the petition having been finally presented at Karachi on 7th February, 1984, there was no delay. The delay, if any, is condoned subject to all just exceptions.
2. Respondent Moizuddin Ahmad served as Secretary to the Government of Baluchistan from October, 1972 to November, 1977. He was given pay in NPS 18 from October, 1972 to May 1976 and in NPS 19 from May, 1976 to November, 1977. He, however, claimed pay in NPS 20 for all this period but the Government allowed him such pay only for the period from 5th July, 1977. His representation to the Provincial and the Federal Government having failed he moved an appeal before this Tribunal. The Tribunal came to the view that he was entitled to pay in NPS 20 from 28th February, 1974 in terms of the Federal Government letter No. 3/3/73‑ARC‑II dated 24th March, 1974 and that even if he had not completed 15 years of service as required in that letter, he was, nevertheless, entitled to the pay of the post under section 17 of the Civil Servants Act.
3. The learned Advocate‑General, Baluchistan, points out that although in the letter dated 24th March, 1974 the post of the Provincial Secretary is in Grade 20, but the minimum length of service for eligibility to that Grade as provided in that very letter is 15 years and that the respondent was not entitled to pay in NPS 20 until he completed the required length of service. Adverting to section 17 of the Civil Servants Act, he pointed out that even under that section entitlement to the pay sanctioned, for the post was not unconditional but subject to the rules.
4. The point raised requires consideration. Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted. M.Z.M. Leave granted.