2007 PLP 218 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN — Petitioner Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED through President and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 218 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Javed Iqbal and Ch. Ijaz Ahmed, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN — Petitioner Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED through President and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 218 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 218 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Javed Iqbal and Ch. Ijaz Ahmed, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 218 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN — Petitioner Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED through President and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Muhammad Iqbal Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and A.H. Masood, Advocate-on-Record for Caveat.
Headnotes / Summary
(On review from the judgment of this Court, dated 27-3-2003 passed in C.P. No.1687-L of 2001 and on appeal from judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Lahore, passed in Appeal No.27-L of 1999).
Art. 188
Petition for review of Supreme Court judgment
Petitioner had sought review of judgment whereby his petition for leave to appeal had been dismissed
All the points agitated while arguing petition had been dilated upon and decided after having gone through entire record with care and caution
Petitioner on the basis of sheer technicalities, could not be absolved from serious charges of misappropriation and embezzlement of heavy amount
Factum of misappropriation and embezzlement against petitioner had been proved and even petitioner having admitted said allegation, question of un awareness of petitioner would not arise
No case of review having been made out, petition was dismissed. Muhammad Iqbal Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and A.H. Masood, Advocate-on-Record for Caveat.
Judgment & Decree
JAVED IQBAL, J.
The petitioner seeks review of the judgment, dated 27-3-2003 whereby the civil petition for leave to appeal preferred on behalf of petitioner has been dismissed.
2. All the points agitated while arguing the petition on 27-3-2003 A have been dilated upon and decided after having gone through the entire record with care and caution. From whatever angle the case may be examined on the basis of sheer technicalities as already held in the judgment impugned by the petitioner cannot be absolved from serious charges of misappropriation and embezzlement of heavy amount and encashment of 26 CPRs twice. The factum of misappropriation and embezzlement has been proved. It is worth-mentioning that insofar as the admissions made by the petitioner on 4-7-1994, 10-7-1994 and 27-8-1994 are concerned were well within his knowledge and got exhibited A before the Labour Court, hence the question of unawareness does not arise.
3. No case of review is made out and accordingly the petition being meritless is dismissed. H.B.T./M-61/SC Review petition dismissed.