1981 PLP 1301 (CLC)
ALLAH DAD‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1301 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ALLAH DAD‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) Evidence Act (I of 1872)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1301 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Evidence Act (I of 1872)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1301 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1301 (CLC) (ALLAH DAD‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Altaf Hussain for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 100‑Second appeal‑ Question of fact‑Suit for pro‑emp tion‑Question whether defendant's right superior‑Pure question of fact‑Finding based on proper appreciation of evidence, held, cannot be upset in second appeal.‑[Question of fact ‑Pre‑emption].
Judgment & Decree
‑‑ S. 50‑Relationship between vendee and vendor‑Proof‑Appel lant contesting suit for possession of land through pre‑emption on ground of collateral relationship with vendor‑ Appellant's witnesses only narrating pedigree‑table‑Such evidence, held, not in conformity with provisions of S. 50‑One witness admitting pedigree‑table to have been disclosed to him by his father to prove relationships‑Both Courts below, held further, rightly rejected such evidence.‑[Pre emption]. Haji Ilahl Bakhsh and others v. Mst. Nawab Bibi and others P L D 1966 Lah. 654 ; Ghulam Muhammad and another v. Allah Yar and others P L D 1965 Lah. 482 and Shah Nawaz and others v. Nawab Khan P L D 1976 S C 767 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
S. 100‑Second appeal‑ Question of fact‑Suit for pro‑emp tion‑Question whether defendant's right superior‑Pure question of fact‑Finding based on proper appreciation of evidence, held, cannot be upset in second appeal.‑[Question of fact ‑Pre‑emption]. Ch. Muhammad Hayar for Appellant. Altaf Hussain for Respondent. Date of hearing : 26th November, 1979.