PCRLJ 2011

2011 P Cr (PLP)

MUHAMMAD AYOOB alias AYOOB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2010-August-6
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD AYOOB alias AYOOB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AYOOB alias AYOOB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Bail, grant of

Counsel for accused had stated that other co-accused numbering 23 had already been admitted to pre-arrest bail by the Trial Court and that case of accused was similarly placed as he had been assigned the same role which had been assigned in the F.I.R. to said other 23 accused

State Counsel had confirmed the statement of counsel for accused; and stated that he had no objection, if rule of consistency was followed and accused was also admitted to bail

Accused, in circumstances was admitted to bail.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD TASNIM, J.

Learned counsel for the applicant says that other co-accused numbering 23 have already been admitted to pre-arrest bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Hudood), Sukkur per order dated 12-7-2010. He says that case of the applicant is similarly placed as he has been assigned the same role which has been assigned in the F.I.R. to other mentioned 23 co-accused. Learned DPG confirms the statement of learned counsel for the applicant and says that he has no objection if rule of consistency is followed and present applicant is also admitted to bail. In the circumstances, present applicant is admitted to bail subject p to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 (One lac) and execution of personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. Bail application stands. disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./M-144/K Bail granted.