2015 PLP 1549 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ANAYAT GONDAL — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2015 PLP 1549 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sarmad Jalal Osmany, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ANAYAT GONDAL — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 1549 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 1549 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sarmad Jalal Osmany, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 1549 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ANAYAT GONDAL — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 6th May, 2015.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 184(3)
Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. III, R. 10(a)
Constitutional petition before the Supreme Court under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution
Office objection overruling of
Matter concerning Ad-hoc Relief allowance for entire Provincial District Judiciary
Judicial officer/petitioner filed constitutional petition before the Supreme Court with the grievance that Provincial Government was not giving 50% Ad hoc Relief allowance to the members of the District Judiciary in the Province as well as the staff attached to the same, whereas said allowance had been allowed to the other members of the civil service of the Provincial Government
Office objection on the said petition to the effect that the grievance of the petitioner was an individual grievance and did not pertain to the entire Provincial District Judiciary
Petitioner was a judicial officer serving in a Province
Grievance raised by the petitioner was not his individual grievance but of the entire Provincial District Judiciary
Office objection was consequently overruled by the Supreme Court with the direction to let the present petition come up for hearing in the Supreme Court in due course
Judgment & Decree
SARMAD JALAL OSMANY, J.
The grievance of the appellant is that the Punjab Government is not giving 50% Ad hoc Relief Allowance to the members of the district judiciary in Punjab as well as staff attached to the same whereas this allowance has been allowed to the other members of the civil service of the Punjab Government. Per the appellant this is not his individual grievance but pertains to entire district judiciary of the Punjab and therefore office objection to this effect should be overruled.
2. I have heard the appellant who appeared in person and is a judicial officer serving in the Punjab. In the circumstances of the case I am of the opinion that this is not his individual grievance but of the entire Punjab District Judiciary and consequently office objection is overruled. Let the Petition come up for hearing in due course in Court. MWA/M-33/SC Order accordingly.