1981CLC249 (PLP)
BULAND KHAN‑Appellant Versus CHIRAGH DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981CLC249 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ilyas, J |
| Parties | BULAND KHAN‑Appellant Versus CHIRAGH DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981CLC249 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981CLC249 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Ilyas, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981CLC249 (PLP) (BULAND KHAN‑Appellant Versus CHIRAGH DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Faqir Hussain for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ Ss. 96, 100 & 115(1)‑Appeal‑Revision‑Respondent challenging order of trial Court in revision before Additional District Judge Additional 'District Judge accepting revision and dismissing suit Such order being passed in revisional jurisdiction and not in original jurisdiction, Regular First Appeal, against such order, held, not competent‑First Appeal, held further, could not be treated as Second appeal and second revision under subsection (4) of S. 115 also not entertainable.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Revision (civil)].
Judgment & Decree
versus CHIRAGH DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents Regular First Appeal No. 127 of 1980, decided on 30th June, 1980. ‑‑ Ss. 96, 100 & 115(1)‑Appeal‑Revision‑Respondent challenging order of trial Court in revision before Additional District Judge Additional 'District Judge accepting revision and dismissing suit Such order being passed in revisional jurisdiction and not in original jurisdiction, Regular First Appeal, against such order, held, not competent‑First Appeal, held further, could not be treated as Second appeal and second revision under subsection (4) of S. 115 also not entertainable.‑[Appeal (civil)‑Revision (civil)]. Syed Faqir Hussain for Appellant.