1987 PLP 2648 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 2648 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 2648 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 2648 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 2648 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD TANVEER AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Saleem Raza for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.382--Bail, grant of--Eye witnesses including complainant refused to support allegation against accused in affidavit sworn by them--Question of guilt/innocence of accused requiring further inquiry--Bail granted. Ch. Ashraf Hijazee for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.382--Bail, grant of--Eye witnesses including complainant refused to support allegation against accused in affidavit sworn by them--Question of guilt/innocence of accused requiring further inquiry--Bail granted. Ch. Muhammad Saleem Raza for Petitioner. Ch. Ashraf Hijazee for the State. This is an application for the grant of bail to Muhammad Tanveer Ahmad petitioner in a case under section 382 PPC registered at Police Station North Cantt, Lahore vide FIR No.95/1987 dated 19-3-1987. 2. The allegations against the petitioner are that he forcibly snatched away Rs.200 and some other articles from Mst. Aisha Bibi complainant. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the eye witnesses including the complainant have sworn affidavits exonerating the petitioner from the commission of the crime. Mst.Aisha Bibi comp lainant is very much present in the Court. She owns affidavit Annex: wherein she has exonerated the petitioner from the commission of offence. The learned counsel for the State is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that all the eye-witnesses including the complainant have refused to support the allegations against the petitioner in affidavits sworn by them. That being the position, I am of: the view that the question of guilt/innocence of the petitioner requires further enquiry. 5. For what has been said above, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the P satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, City/Duty Magistrate, Lahore. M.Y.H./M-404/L Bail granted.