1994 PLP 383 (SCMR)
BANDAI SHAH and 9 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, N.‑W.F.P, through Senior Member of the Board
| Citation | 1994 PLP 383 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman, Saleem Akhtar and |
| Parties | BANDAI SHAH and 9 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, N.‑W.F.P, through Senior Member of the Board |
| Primary Law | North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act (XXV of 1950)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 383 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act (XXV of 1950)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 383 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman, Saleem Akhtar and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 383 (SCMR) (BANDAI SHAH and 9 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, N.‑W.F.P, through Senior Member of the Board). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Qazi M. Anwar, Advocate and Mian Shakirullah Jan‑, Advocate‑on- Record (absent) for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 17th October, 1993.
- 2. Notice to the Advocate‑General also be issued.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of Peshawar High Court, Peshawar dated &11‑1992 passed in Review Petition No.24 of 1992 and‑order dated 26‑10‑1992 passed in W.P. No.587 of 1990). ‑‑‑S. 56 [as extended to Provincially Administered Tribal Areas by Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Application of Laws) Regulation (I of 1974)]‑‑ West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), S.1‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether Board of Revenue had not been conferred jurisdiction by reference under S. 56, North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 extended to Provincially Administered Tribal Areas by Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Application of Laws) Regulation (I of 1974) enforced on 17‑4‑1974, the separate extension/application of Board of Revenue Act, 1957, to the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas being unnecessary, for purposes of North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 on account of that provision.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the order of Peshawar High Court, Peshawar dated &11‑1992 passed in Review Petition No.24 of 1992 and‑order dated 26‑10‑1992 passed in W.P. No.587 of 1990). ‑‑‑S. 56 [as extended to Provincially Administered Tribal Areas by Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Application of Laws) Regulation (I of 1974)]‑‑ West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), S.1‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether Board of Revenue had not been conferred jurisdiction by reference under S. 56, North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 extended to Provincially Administered Tribal Areas by Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Application of Laws) Regulation (I of 1974) enforced on 17‑4‑1974, the separate extension/application of Board of Revenue Act, 1957, to the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas being unnecessary, for purposes of North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 on account of that provision. Qazi M. Anwar, Advocate and Mian Shakirullah Jan‑, Advocate‑on- Record (absent) for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 17th October, 1993. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J: ‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to examine whether the Board of Revenue has not been conferred jurisdiction by reference under section 56 of the North‑West Frontier Province Tenancy Act, 1950 extended to the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas by Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Application of Laws) Regulation, 1974 (Regulation I of 1974) enforced on 17‑4‑1974, the separate extension/application of the Board of Revenue Act, 1957 to the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas being unnecessary for the purposes of N.‑W.F.P. Tenancy Act on account of this provision.
2. Notice to the Advocate‑General also be issued.
3. To be completed early for hearing. A.A./B‑218/S Leave granted.