2014 PLP 1868 (YLR)
MURSALEEN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2014 PLP 1868 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Gilgit-Baltistan, Chief Court |
| Bench Members | Wazeer Shakeel Ahmed, J |
| Parties | MURSALEEN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2014 PLP 1868 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2014 PLP 1868 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Gilgit-Baltistan, Chief Court bench comprising: Wazeer Shakeel Ahmed, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2014 PLP 1868 (YLR) (MURSALEEN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Haq Nawaz for Petitioners.
- Assistant Advocate General for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324
Attempt to commit qatl-e-amd
Role attributed to accused had resulted into an injury of leg of the injured
Such was also a case with the other injured person in the same case
Tentative assessment of the record of the case, raised a question whether the provision of the S.324, P.P.C. was attracted in the case, or it was a case of simple hurt
Sustained injury being not on the vital part of the body of the injured, it was yet to be determined, if accused intended to kill the injured which made the case that of further inquiry
Co-accused had already been enlarged on bail
Accused was also entitled to be enlarged on bail. Assistant Advocate General for the State.
Judgment & Decree
WAZEER SHAKEEL AHMED, J.
Heard. Admittedly the role attributed to accused have resulted into an injury on the leg of injured. This is also a case with the other injured person in the same case. The tentative assessment of the record of the case in hand raises a question whether the provision of the section 324, P.P.C. attracts in the case or is it a case of simple hurt, and as sustained injury was not on the vital parts of the body of the injured, it is yet to be determined if the accused intended to kill the injured making the case in hand as that of a further inquiry. The co-accused has already being enlarged on bail entitling the petitioner to be enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds amounting to Rs.300,000 with two local sureties to the satisfaction of the trial Court. HBT/8/GB Bail granted.