2001 P Cr (PLP)
NASIR MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ AYUB and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | NASIR MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ AYUB and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (NASIR MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ AYUB and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Zafar for Petitioner.
- Muhammad Zubair Khalid for Respondent No. 1.
- Despite the undertaking by the learned counsel, the respondent No. 1, has not appeared. He is proceeded ex parte and the request for an adjournment made by the learned counsel (Mr. Muhammad Zubair Khalid, Advocate) is disallowed.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(5)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/34/109
Accused was found guilty in successive police investigations-- Recovery of weapon of offence had been effected from the accused
Fatal injury by a pistol on the person of the deceased was attributed to accused-- Reasonable grounds, prima facie, were available to believe the accused being guilty of the offence falling within the prohibition contained in S.497(1), Cr.P.C.
Bail granted to accused by Sessions Court was cancelled in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
M.A. Zafar for Petitioner. Muhammad Zubair Khalid for Respondent No.
1. M. Siddique Khalid for the State. Despite the undertaking by the learned counsel, the respondent No. 1, has not appeared. He is proceeded ex parte and the request for an adjournment made by the learned counsel (Mr. Muhammad Zubair Khalid, Advocate) is disallowed.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the cancellation of bail granted to the respondent No.1, in case F.I.R. No.322 of 1998, dated 20-5-1998 under sections 302/34/109, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Sargodha Road, Faisalabad. The learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant argued that the respondent No. 1, was the principal accused, who had fired the fatal shot on the deceased Shahid Mehmood. He was found guilty in all four police investigations. Recovery of crime weapon i.e. .30 bore pistol was effected from the respondent No. 1, which matched with empties recovered from the spot. The bail of the petitioner was repeatedly dismissed and granted without any valid grounds. The learned counsel for the State also submitted that the fatal shot was attributed to respondent No. 1.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length.
4. The respondent No.1 was found guilty during successive police investigations. The recovery of weapon was also effected from him. He is alleged to have caused the fatal injury on the person of the deceased from his pistol. Prima facie there are reasonable grounds to- believe that the respondent No. 1, was guilty of the offence falling within the prohibition of section 497, Cr.P.C.
5. For the foregoing reasons, this petition for the cancellation of bail is allowed and the bail granted vide order dated 18-8-1999, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faisalabad is hereby cancelled. N.H.Q./N-53/L Bail cancelled.