1983 PLP 2270 (CLC)
FAQIR HUSSAIN & Co.‑Appellant Versus ASGHAR ALI GHULAM HUSSAIN ANTRIA
| Citation | 1983 PLP 2270 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | K. A. Ghani, ,l |
| Parties | FAQIR HUSSAIN & Co.‑Appellant Versus ASGHAR ALI GHULAM HUSSAIN ANTRIA |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 2270 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 2270 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: K. A. Ghani, ,l.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 2270 (CLC) (FAQIR HUSSAIN & Co.‑Appellant Versus ASGHAR ALI GHULAM HUSSAIN ANTRIA). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Aftab Kizalbash for Appellant.
- Moniruddin for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 16th December, 1981.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ S. 15‑Ejectment‑Second Appeal‑Appellant standing ejected on demolition of building by Karachi Development Authority‑ Appeal becoming infructuous dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment & Decree
Aftab Kizalbash for Appellant. Moniruddin for Respondents. Date of hearing : 16th December, 1981. This is an application filed by the learned Advocate for the res pondent praying therein that the appeal be dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that the demised building/premises does not exist as the same has already been demolished by the Karachi Deve lopment Authority and that all the tenants (including appellants) stand ejected therefrom.
2. Without going into the merits of the case and without preju dice to the rights of the appellants the learned counsel for the appel lants concedes that the appeal has become infructuous. He however, submits that the appellants would seek other legal remedies, which may be available to them in the circumstances of the case. The learned counsel for 'appellants accordingly does not oppose the application to the extent that the appeal has become infructuous.
3. The application (C. M. A. 3308/81) is granted and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. C. M, A. No. 3408/81‑In the circumstances mentioned in the above order passed on C. M. A. No. 3308/81, the learned counsel for the appellants, withdraws this application. Application is dismissed. M.Y.H. Orders accordingly.