CLC 1981

1981 PLP 430 (CLC)

MOHAMMADI UTENSIL PRODUCTS‑Plaintiff Versus SHAMASUDDIN ALIBHOY‑Defendant

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Suit No. 107 of 1971, decided on 16th April, 1980.
Honorable Judges
Naimuddin, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 430 (CLC)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Naimuddin, J
Parties MOHAMMADI UTENSIL PRODUCTS‑Plaintiff Versus SHAMASUDDIN ALIBHOY‑Defendant
Primary Law Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 430 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 430 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Naimuddin, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 430 (CLC) (MOHAMMADI UTENSIL PRODUCTS‑Plaintiff Versus SHAMASUDDIN ALIBHOY‑Defendant). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

Representation

  • Dates of hearing: 14th, 15th and 16th April, 1980.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ O. XXXVII read with Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), S.80‑Evidence, appreciation of Cheques issued by defendants in favour of plaintiff dishonoured by Bank‑Defendant's signatures on dishonoured cheques found identical with those on specimen signature card‑Ownership of business vesting in plaintiff and no contrary evidence produced in such behalf‑Defendant making promise to make payment to plaintiff in cash and suffering no damage for non‑service of notice or return or dishonour of cheques‑Defendant, held, liable to pay amount of cheques to plaintiff, in circumstances. R. v. Silverlock (1891) 2 Q B 766; S. M. Zahir v. Pirzada Syed Fazal Ali Ajmeri 1974 S C M R 490; Ch. Muhammad Sadiq v. Mumtaz Ali and another P L D 1976 Quetta 53; Messrs Muhammad Yousuf lqbal Ahmed v. IVth Sind Labour Court, Karachi and another P L D 1977 Kar. 711; Cochin Nayar Bank Ltd. v. M. S. Muhammad Sharifuddin and others (1957) 27 Co. Cas. 494; Chunilal Bhoopal v. Chandra Dutta and others A I R 1953 Assam 94; Messrs Khazana Mal Khub Chand v. G. de la Rue Brown A I R 1935 Lah. 413 and Madubai Francia Damel and others v.. Vadilal Kashidas and others A I R 1939 Bom. 147 ref. Muhammad Arif for Plaintiff. Mohsin Tayab Ali for Defendant.

Judgment & Decree

SHAMASUDDIN ALIBHOY‑Defendant Suit No. 107 of 1971, decided on 16th April, 1980. ‑‑ O. XXXVII read with Negotiable Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), S.80‑Evidence, appreciation of Cheques issued by defendants in favour of plaintiff dishonoured by Bank‑Defendant's signatures on dishonoured cheques found identical with those on specimen signature card‑Ownership of business vesting in plaintiff and no contrary evidence produced in such behalf‑Defendant making promise to make payment to plaintiff in cash and suffering no damage for non‑service of notice or return or dishonour of cheques‑Defendant, held, liable to pay amount of cheques to plaintiff, in circumstances. R. v. Silverlock (1891) 2 Q B 766; S. M. Zahir v. Pirzada Syed Fazal Ali Ajmeri 1974 S C M R 490; Ch. Muhammad Sadiq v. Mumtaz Ali and another P L D 1976 Quetta 53; Messrs Muhammad Yousuf lqbal Ahmed v. IVth Sind Labour Court, Karachi and another P L D 1977 Kar. 711; Cochin Nayar Bank Ltd. v. M. S. Muhammad Sharifuddin and others (1957) 27 Co. Cas. 494; Chunilal Bhoopal v. Chandra Dutta and others A I R 1953 Assam 94; Messrs Khazana Mal Khub Chand v. G. de la Rue Brown A I R 1935 Lah. 413 and Madubai Francia Damel and others v.. Vadilal Kashidas and others A I R 1939 Bom. 147 ref. Muhammad Arif for Plaintiff. Mohsin Tayab Ali for Defendant. Dates of hearing: 14th, 15th and 16th April, 1980.