2006 PLP 2442 (YLR)
EHSAN-UL-HAQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 2442 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Aslam, J |
| Parties | EHSAN-UL-HAQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 2442 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 2442 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Aslam, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 2442 (YLR) (EHSAN-UL-HAQ — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Arshad Ali Chowhan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 337-A(i), 337-F(i), L-(ii) & 34
Trial Court by its order had initiated proceedings under Ss.87 & 88, Cr.P.C. against accused
Pre- arrest hail being extra-ordinary relief, was to be granted to an innocent person
In view of proceedings against accused under Ss.87 & 88, Cr.P.C., his bail petition was dismissed. Zafar Iqbal Bhatti for the Complainant. Sohail Tariq for the State along with Qamar Abbas, S.-I. with Record.
Judgment & Decree
SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASLAM, J.
The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.40 dated 23-1-2005 registered under sections 324/337-A(i)/337-F(i)/337-K(ii)/34, P.P.C. with Police Station, Saddar Arifwala District Pakpattan Sharif, on the ground that the instant F.I.R. has been lodged with mala fide intention just to pressurize the petitioner for compromise because actually complainant party caused injuries to the petitioner side.
2. Conversely, learned counsel for the complainant assisted by the learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for confirmation of bail by submitting that proceedings under sections 87/88, Cr.P.C. have been initiated against the petitioner and he is not entitled to the concession of the pre-arrest bail.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. Vide order dated 24-5-2005 passed by the learned trial Court the proceedings under sections 87/88, Cr.P.C. have been initiated against the petitioner. Pre-arrest bail is an extraordinary relief, which is granted to an innocent person. Resultantly, this petition is meritless and is dismissed. H.B.T./E-6/L Petition dismissed.