MLD 1987

1987 PLP 3094 (MLD)

SARFRAZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Appeal No. 310 of 1987, decided on 8th September, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Afrasiab Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 3094 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Afrasiab Khan, J
Parties SARFRAZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 3094 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 3094 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Afrasiab Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 3094 (MLD) (SARFRAZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Khawaja Sultan Ahmad for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.426--Suspension of sentence for short period--Father of accused stated to be very seriously ill and counsel appearing for State having no objection if accused allowed bail for seven days to meet his ailing father--Accused admitted to bail for seven days. S. M. Zubair Additional Addl. A.G. Punjab for the State.

Judgment & Decree

S.426--Suspension of sentence for short period--Father of accused stated to be very seriously ill and counsel appearing for State having no objection if accused allowed bail for seven days to meet his ailing father--Accused admitted to bail for seven days. Khawaja Sultan Ahmad for Petitioner. S. M. Zubair Additional Addl. A.G. Punjab for the State. The petitioner Sarfraz Ahmad has moved this petition under section 426, Cr.P.C. for the suspension of his sentence for a short period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the father of the petitioner is suffering from chronic liver failure and as such, he is lying at his death bed. Learned counsel has prayed that the petitioner may be admitted to bail for seven days so that he may meet his dying father. Learned counsel has given his personal assurance in the case that he will see to it that after the expiry of the period given to the petitioner, the petitioner surrenders to the jail authorities. Mr. S.M. Zubair, learned Additional Advocate-General, Punjab, has appeared before me and has made a categorical statement that he has no objection if in view of the special circumstances of the case the petitioner is allowed seven days time to meet his ailing father. 3. In view of the statement having been made by the learned Law Officer, the petitioner is admitted to bail for seven diva in the sum of Rs. 2,00,000 (Rupees two lacs) with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The petitioner shall surrender on 15-9-1987. This petition) stands disposed of. M. Y.H./S-101/L Petition disposed of.