1989 PLP 4062 (MLD)
SAFOORAN BIBI Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION MISRI SHAH and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4062 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rashid Aziz Khan, J |
| Parties | SAFOORAN BIBI Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION MISRI SHAH and another‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4062 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4062 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rashid Aziz Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4062 (MLD) (SAFOORAN BIBI Petitioner Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION MISRI SHAH and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Afzal Wahla for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Station House Officer of Police Station stated in Court that the alleged detenu was required in connection with a murder case‑‑Held, since the detenu was required m a criminal case no order was required to be passed in that connection. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Station House Officer of, Police Station was allegedly consistently harassing family members of petitioner by arresting them and releasing them before raid of bailiff on institution of habeas corpus petition which had to be filed 4/5 times in this connection‑‑A copy of present petition alongwith a copy of order was directed to be sent to Superintendent of Police, to look into the matter, and hold an inquiry about highhandedness of the S.H.O. and to hear petitioner in person before giving his finding.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Station House Officer of Police Station stated in Court that the alleged detenu was required in connection with a murder case‑‑Held, since the detenu was required m a criminal case no order was required to be passed in that connection. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Station House Officer of, Police Station was allegedly consistently harassing family members of petitioner by arresting them and releasing them before raid of bailiff on institution of habeas corpus petition which had to be filed 4/5 times in this connection‑‑A copy of present petition alongwith a copy of order was directed to be sent to Superintendent of Police, to look into the matter, and hold an inquiry about highhandedness of the S.H.O. and to hear petitioner in person before giving his finding. Muhammad Afzal Wahla for Petitioner. In pursuance of a direction of this Court S.H.O./respondent No.1. has entered appearance. He has stated that the alleged detenu Mahmood son of Muhammad Din is required in connection with a murder case. Learned counsel contends that the respondent is consistently harassing the family members of the petitioner by arresting them and when a habeas corpus petition is filed, he releases them before the bailiff can raid the premises. Submits that in this connection 4/5 habeas corpus petitions were filed.
2. Since the alleged detenu is required in a criminal case, therefore, no order is required to be passed. However, a copy of this petition alongwith a copy of the order shall be sent to the Superintendent of Police, Lahore City to look into the matter and hold an inquiry about the highhandedness of respondent No.l. He shall hear the petitioner in person before giving his finding. He shall send a copy of the inquiry report to the Deputy Registrar (Judl.) of this Court, within one month. With this direction the petition is dismissed. N.H.Q./S/533/L Petition dismissed.