1993 PLP 2322 (SCMR)
ADMINISTRATOR, MARKET COMMITTEE, KASUR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and 17 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1993 PLP 2322 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ADMINISTRATOR, MARKET COMMITTEE, KASUR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and 17 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (General) Rules, 1979‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 2322 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (General) Rules, 1979‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 2322 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 2322 (SCMR) (ADMINISTRATOR, MARKET COMMITTEE, KASUR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and 17 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Serior Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool A. Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record and Hamid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 17th July, 1993 .
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment/order of Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 30‑5‑1993 in Writ Petitions Nos.10563,10264 and 2113 of 1992 respectively). ‑‑‑‑R. 79‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether R. 79, Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (General) Rules, 1979 was only prospective and that it did not affect vegetable markets which were already in existence before it came into force.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J‑--Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether Rule 79, Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (General) Rules, 1979, is only prospective and that it does not affect vegetable markets which were already in existence before it came into force.
2. During the pendency of the appeals the operation of the order of the High Court shall remain suspended. A.A./A‑1039/S Leave granted.