SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 1322 (SCMR)

GHULAM MUHAMMAD KHAN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent Criminal Petition No.315 of 1988, decided on 15th

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
THE STATE‑‑Respondent Criminal Petition No.315 of 1988, decided on 15th
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1322 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties GHULAM MUHAMMAD KHAN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent Criminal Petition No.315 of 1988, decided on 15th
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1322 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1322 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1322 (SCMR) (GHULAM MUHAMMAD KHAN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent Criminal Petition No.315 of 1988, decided on 15th). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Ras Tariq Chaudhry, Advocate Supreme Court and Ghulam N.fujataba." Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Maqbool Elahi Malik A.‑G. Pb. for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 15th March, 1989.
  • Advocate‑General Punjab shall appear personally to assist the Court.

Headnotes / Summary

March, 1989. (From the order of the Lahore High Court dated 3‑9‑1988 in Cr. Misc. 2508/B of 1988). ‑‑‑S.497/498‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Conditional order while granting bail or confirming an interim bail‑‑Validity‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine question whether while admitting an accused to bail or confirming an interim bail, a condition could be imposed or whether conditional order of bail was in accordance with law.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑The short nevertheless important legal question involved in this petition for special leave to appeal against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 3‑9‑88 is that while admitting an accused to bail or A confirming an interim bail, a condition could be imposed or in other words is a conditional order of bail in accordance with law. The point is of public importance. It needs detailed examination and calls for authoritative pronouncement. Leave is accordingly granted. The appeal shall be made ready on the present record and shall be set down for final hearing in the next session at Lahore. Advocate‑General Punjab shall appear personally to assist the Court. M.B.A./G‑189/S Leave granted.