1989 PLP 695 (SCMR)
ABDUL SATTAR MALIK — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB — Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 695 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, Ghulam Mujaddid and Ali Hussain Qazilhash, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL SATTAR MALIK — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 695 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 695 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, Ghulam Mujaddid and Ali Hussain Qazilhash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 695 (SCMR) (ABDUL SATTAR MALIK — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Afzal, Advocate Supreme Court and- Hamid Aslam Oureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.
- M.Nawaz Abbasi, Assistant Advocate-General and Rao M.Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 27th November, 1988.
- Malik Muhammad Afzal, Advocate Supreme Court and‑ Hamid Aslam Oureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.
- M.Nawaz Abbasi, Assistant Advocate‑General and Rao M.Yousaf Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Lahore High Court, dated 8-10-1977, passed in Writ Petition No.2636 of 1977).
Seniority in cadre--Appellant failing to implead persons over whom he claimed seniority--Such persons being necessary parties in whose absence no relief could be granted, appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑ Seniority in cadre‑‑Appellant failing to implead persons over whom he claimed seniority‑‑Such persons being necessary parties in whose absence no relief could be granted, appeal was dismissed as not maintainable. Malik Muhammad Afzal, Advocate Supreme Court and‑ Hamid Aslam Oureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant. M.Nawaz Abbasi, Assistant Advocate‑General and Rao M.Yousaf Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent. Date of hearing: 27th November, 1988. ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.‑‑This is an appeal from the order of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, dated 8‑10‑1977.
2. The facts of this case need not be given and suffice it to say that the appellant claims seniority over a number of Engineers of the Lahore Municipal Corporation but he has failed to implead them as party in this appeal. Admittedly the persons over whom the appellant seeks seniority are necessary parties and, therefore, in their absence no relief can be granted to the appellant. We have thus a no other alternative but to dismiss this appeal with no order as to costs. The appellant is, however, at liberty to approach the relevant authorities to seek his redress. AA./A‑402/S Appeal dismissed.