1989 P Cr (PLP)
BASHIR K.A. MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J |
| Parties | BASHIR K.A. MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (BASHIR K.A. MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Customs Act (IV of 1969), Ss.2 & 185(0‑‑Notification No. SRO MF(Rd) 51 CUS, dated 27‑12‑1950 as amended on 13‑5‑1962 and 22‑9‑1964‑ Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly attempted to‑smuggle jewellery to Libya‑‑From facts stated in challan it prima facie appeared that jewellery was being carried by accused for presenting same to his would be wife‑‑Case needed further inquiry‑ Accused admitted to bail in circumstances. Khawaja Naveed for Applicant. Ashiq Ali Zaidi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Special Criminal Bail Application No. 105 of 1988, decided' on 20th October, 1988. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Customs Act (IV of 1969), Ss.2 & 185(0‑‑Notification No. SRO MF(Rd) 51 CUS, dated 27‑12‑1950 as amended on 13‑5‑1962 and 22‑9‑1964‑ Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly attempted to‑smuggle jewellery to Libya‑‑From facts stated in challan it prima facie appeared that jewellery was being carried by accused for presenting same to his would be wife‑‑Case needed further inquiry‑ Accused admitted to bail in circumstances. Khawaja Naveed for Applicant. Ashiq Ali Zaidi for the State. The applicant in this case was arrested on 2‑9‑1988 for allegedly attempting to smuggle jewellery made of gold valued 4,t Rs.1,10,
000. The jewellery was recovered from a jewellery box lying in the handbag of the applicant. From the challan submitted in the case it appears that the applicant stated before the Investigating Agency that jewellery was being carried by him to Libya for presenting the same to his would be wife. Under Notification SRO Mf, (Rd)51 Cus., dated 27‑12‑1950 as amended by Notification No. 16‑Cus, dated 13‑5‑1962 and Notification No. 57‑Cus., dated 22‑9‑1964, personal jewellery of a passenger exported or imported by him in good faith for his own use and forming part of his baggage is exempted. From the facts stated in the challan it prima facie appears that the jewellery was being carried by the applicant for presenting the same to his would be wife. In these circumstances the case of the applicant needs further enquiry at this stage and` I accordingly admit the applicant to bail in the sum of Rupees one lac with one surety and P.R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. M.Y.H./B‑96/K Bail granted.