YLR 2009

2009 PLP 1822 (YLR)

SIKANDAR MALLAH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No. S-181 of 2007, decided on 22nd May, 2007.
Honorable Judges
Faisal Arab, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP 1822 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Faisal Arab, J
Parties SIKANDAR MALLAH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 1822 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 1822 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Faisal Arab, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 1822 (YLR) (SIKANDAR MALLAH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S.497

Offences Against Property ( Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.20

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.382, 148, 149 & 34

Bail, grant of

Since co-accused against whom some allegations were levelled in the F.I.R., had been granted bail by the High Court accused could also be enlarged on bail on the ground of rule of consistency

Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Ghulam Sajjad Gopang for Applicant. M. Azeem Panhwar for the State.

Judgment & Decree

FAISAL ARAB, J.

Through this bail application, applicant Sikandar Mallah, who is involved in Crime No.1 of 2005 registered with Police Station Mirpur, under section 20 Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 and sections 382, 148, 149 and 34, P.P.C, seeks bail on the ground of consistency. Learned counsel for the applicant states that since co-accused against whom same allegations are levelled in the F.I.R. have been granted bail by this Court, Applicant Sikandar Mallah may also be enlarge on bail on the ground of rule of consistency. Learned State Counsel concedes to the grant of bail to the applicant on the rule of consistency. Looking to the circumstances, applicant Sikandar Mallah is also granted bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and P.R Bond in the like amount to then satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S-64/K Bail granted.