SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 1111 (SCMR)

ZAHID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Petition No. 44-R of 1984, decided on 6th April, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 1111 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ
Parties ZAHID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1111 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1111 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1111 (SCMR) (ZAHID HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Syed Manzoor Hussain Bokhari, Advocate Supreme Court with Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 6th April, 1986.
  • Syed Manzoor Hussain Bokhari, Advocate Supreme Court with Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 7-5-1984 in Criminal Appeal, No.614 of 1980). --Art. 185(3)--Petition for leave to appeal barred by 66 days--Case even otherwise not fit for grant of leave--Petition dismissed. Nemo for the State.

Judgment & Decree

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑The petitioner seeks leave to appeal from the Judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 7‑5‑1984 dismissing his Criminal Appeal No.614 of

180. The petition is barred by 66 days. Even otherwise, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find that it is not a fit case for grant of leave. The petition, therefore, dismissed as barred by limitation. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.