1993 PLP 2288 (SCMR)
Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1993 PLP 2288 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and Saleem Akhtar, JJ |
| Parties | Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 2288 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 2288 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and Saleem Akhtar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 2288 (SCMR) (Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Q.M. Salim, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 11th April, 1993.
- Rafi Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 7‑2‑1993 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Cr. Misc. No. 226/B of 1993). ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Two different Deputy Superintendents of Police, who investigated the case, had opined that the accused was innocent‑‑‑Police official, who had brought the record of the casein the Court, had also confirmed this fact by reference to the record‑‑ Accused's participation in the offence, therefore, prima facie appeared to be doubtful‑‑‑Petition was consequently converted into an appeal and was accepted‑‑‑Accused was allowed bail accordingly. Rafi Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASSAN SHAH, J.‑‑‑There is, prima facie, force in the contention that the petitioner's participation in the offence is doubtful. Two different Deputy Superintendents of Police, who investigated the case, have opined that the petitioner was innocent. The police official, who brought the record of the case in this Court, has also confirmed this fact by reference to the record. This petition is converted into an appeal and is accepted. The petitioner (Dr. Muhammad Aslam son of Hakam Khan) is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C., Sialkot. N.H.Q/M‑1818/S Bail allowed.