2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ILLAHI BAKHSH TUNIO Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD and 14 others
| Citation | 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Service Tribunal |
| Bench Members | Qazi Muhammad Hussain Siddiqui and Rashid Ali Mirza, Members |
| Parties | ILLAHI BAKHSH TUNIO Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD and 14 others |
| Primary Law | Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: Qazi Muhammad Hussain Siddiqui and Rashid Ali Mirza, Members.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ILLAHI BAKHSH TUNIO Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN ISLAMABAD and 14 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sanaullah Noor Ghauri for Appellant.
- Date of hearing: 18th July, 2006.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 9
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4
Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973, Rr.7 & 8
Appellant was aggrieved by Gazette Notification whereby respondents' who' were junior to appellant in service, were promoted to the post of Assistant Directors (B-17), ignoring appellant and not considering his case for promotion in the meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee, though he was eligible for said promotion
Promotion of appellant was withheld for want of his A.C.Rs. and due to pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him
Appellant had already submitted his A.C.Rs. subsequently and he was also exonerated by the Service Tribunal in disciplinary proceedings against him in appeal; in circumstances, there should be no impediment in considering case of appellant for his promotion
Authorities were directed to consider case of appellant for his promotion to next higher rank, if he was otherwise eligible for promotion
Appeal was accepted accordingly. Asif Hussain Mangi, State Counsel for the Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 291(K)(C.S.) of 2002, decided on 20th July, 2006. Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)
S. 9
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4
Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973, Rr.7 & 8
Appellant was aggrieved by Gazette Notification whereby respondents' who' were junior to appellant in service, were promoted to the post of Assistant Directors (B-17), ignoring appellant and not considering his case for promotion in the meeting of Departmental Promotion Committee, though he was eligible for said promotion
Promotion of appellant was withheld for want of his A.C.Rs. and due to pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him
Appellant had already submitted his A.C.Rs. subsequently and he was also exonerated by the Service Tribunal in disciplinary proceedings against him in appeal; in circumstances, there should be no impediment in considering case of appellant for his promotion
Authorities were directed to consider case of appellant for his promotion to next higher rank, if he was otherwise eligible for promotion
Appeal was accepted accordingly. Sanaullah Noor Ghauri for Appellant. Asif Hussain Mangi, State Counsel for the Respondents. Date of hearing: 18th July, 2006.