1990 PLP 1477 (SCMR)
HAQNAWAZ and 10 others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YASIN and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1477 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and S. Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | HAQNAWAZ and 10 others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YASIN and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1477 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1477 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and S. Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1477 (SCMR) (HAQNAWAZ and 10 others‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YASIN and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Shakirullah Jan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner3 (in C.Ps. 152‑P and 153‑P of 1989).
- Nemo for Respondents (in C.Ps.152‑P and 153‑P of 1989).
- Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jaffari, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioners (in C.P.221‑R of 1989).
- Qazi M. Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.3. (in C.P. 221‑R of 1989).
- Nemo for Respondent. (in C.P.221‑R of 1989).
- Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jaffari, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioners in (C.Ps.221‑R to 229‑R of 1989).
- Nemo for Respondents for Remaining Petitions.
- Date of hearing: 28th June, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 6‑4‑1989 of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal in Appeal No. 10 of 1989, Appeal No.6 of 1989, 161,162, 165,167, 168 of 1989 and Appeal No.8, 9 and 11 of 1989). ‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑‑Leave to appeal having earlier been granted in case involving points similar to those in present cases, leave to appeal was granted in present petitions also.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Learned counsel for the petitioners while relying on the order dated 20‑5‑1989, granting leave to appeal in C.P. No.81‑P of 1989, have stated that similar if not same points, are involved in these cases also. We accordingly grant leave to appeal in these petitions also. In the meanwhile the interim orders passed in C.P.‑221‑R of 1989 and other petitions shall continue in operation in all these cases. H.B.T./H‑73/S Leave granted.