1995 PLP 325 (PLC)
MANAGING DIRECTOR and another Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another
| Citation | 1995 PLP 325 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Mushtaq Ali Qazi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | MANAGING DIRECTOR and another Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another |
| Primary Law | Industrial Dispute‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 325 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Dispute‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 325 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Mushtaq Ali Qazi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 325 (PLC) (MANAGING DIRECTOR and another Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑‑Appeal‑‑‑Maintainability‑‑‑Employer was directed to deposit back benefits awarded ‑ to employee by Labour Appellate Tribunal within 15 days while granting ad interim stay to Employer, but such orders of Appellate Tribunal were not complied with by employer‑‑‑Tribunal finally directed employer to deposit back benefits before next date of hearing, but even on that date back benefits were not deposited and default continued‑‑‑Representative of employer had stated that he was not able to make deposit‑‑‑Appeal filed by employer was dismissed, in circumstances, for non‑compliance of order of Tribunal.
- Azmatullah Khan, Representative for Appellants.
- Khalilur Rehman, Representative for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 12th January, 1995.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑Appeal‑‑‑Maintainability‑‑‑Employer was directed to deposit back benefits awarded ‑ to employee by Labour Appellate Tribunal within 15 days while granting ad interim stay to Employer, but such orders of Appellate Tribunal were not complied with by employer‑‑‑Tribunal finally directed employer to deposit back benefits before next date of hearing, but even on that date back benefits were not deposited and default continued‑‑‑Representative of employer had stated that he was not able to make deposit‑‑‑Appeal filed by employer was dismissed, in circumstances, for non‑compliance of order of Tribunal. Azmatullah Khan, Representative for Appellants. Khalilur Rehman, Representative for Respondents. Date of hearing: 12th January, 1995. The appellant Karachi Transport Corporation was directed to deposit the back benefits within 15 days while admitting the appeal and granting ad interim stay on 9‑8‑1992. These orders were not complied with by the appellant Corporation. Finally on 2‑10‑1994 this Tribunal directed the Corporation to deposit the back benefits before the next date of hearing i.e. 24‑10‑1994 but even on that date the back benefits were not deposited and the default continues. The representative for the Corporation states that he is not able to make the deposit. This appeal is accordingly dismissed for non -compliance of the orders of this Tribunal. H.B.T./2408/Lb.S Appeal dismissed.