2008 PLP 546 (CLC)
MUHAMMAD JUNAID and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government and Town Planning Development Department and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 PLP 546 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD JUNAID and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government and Town Planning Development Department and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 546 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 546 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 546 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD JUNAID and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government and Town Planning Development Department and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Grievance of the petitioner was that despite approved building plan having been filed by him, Authorities were not passing any order and no objection certificate was not being issued to him---Contention of counsel for Authorities was that there was no question of giving any N.O.C. as the space was temporarily allowed to be occupied and in fact, it was over a Nala and subsequently said permission was cancelled---Counsel for petitioner though had disputed contention of counsel for the Authorities, but he had stated that he would be satisfied if a direction was given to the Authorities to dispose of his application in the `affirmative' or 'negative'-Counsel for Authorities undertook that an appropriate order would be passed by the competent authority on such application within three weeks---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
- Abrar Hassan for Petitioners.
- Manzoor Ahmed for Respondents Nos.2 and 3.
- The grievance of the petitioner is that despite having filed approved building plan by him, the respondent is not passing any order and, No Objection Certificate is not being granted to him. Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, learned counsel for respondents Nos.2 and 3 has contended that there is no question of giving any NOC as the space was temporarily allowed to be occupied and in fact, it is over a Nala and subsequently the said permission was cancelled. Mr. Abrar Hassan learned counsel for the petitioner has disputed this contention of Mr. Manzoor Ahmed. However, he states that he will be satisfied if a direction is given to the respondents to dispose of his application in "affirmative" or "negative". Mr. Manzoor Ahmed undertakes that an appropriate order will be passed by the competent authority on such application within three weeks. This constitutional petition stands disposed of on above terms along with the miscellaneous application pending therein.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Grievance of the petitioner was that despite approved building plan having been filed by him, Authorities were not passing any order and no objection certificate was not being issued to him
Contention of counsel for Authorities was that there was no question of giving any N.O.C. as the space was temporarily allowed to be occupied and in fact, it was over a Nala and subsequently said permission was cancelled
Counsel for petitioner though had disputed contention of counsel for the Authorities, but he had stated that he would be satisfied if a direction was given to the Authorities to dispose of his application in the `affirmative' or 'negative'-Counsel for Authorities undertook that an appropriate order would be passed by the competent authority on such application within three weeks
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
The grievance of the petitioner is that despite having filed approved building plan by him, the respondent is not passing any order and, No Objection Certificate is not being granted to him. Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, learned counsel for respondents Nos.2 and 3 has contended that there is no question of giving any NOC as the space was temporarily allowed to be occupied and in fact, it is over a Nala and subsequently the said permission was cancelled. Mr. Abrar Hassan learned counsel for the petitioner has disputed this contention of Mr. Manzoor Ahmed. However, he states that he will be satisfied if a direction is given to the respondents to dispose of his application in "affirmative" or "negative". Mr. Manzoor Ahmed undertakes that an appropriate order will be passed by the competent authority on such application within three weeks. This constitutional petition stands disposed of on above terms along with the miscellaneous application pending therein. H.B.T./M-199/K Order accordingly.