1986 PLP (1) (SCMR)
SHAFIQUL HASSAN SHAH — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB SERVICE TRIBUNAL through its Chairman and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and S. A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | SHAFIQUL HASSAN SHAH — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB SERVICE TRIBUNAL through its Chairman and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and S. A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR) (SHAFIQUL HASSAN SHAH — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB SERVICE TRIBUNAL through its Chairman and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Munir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 13th November, 1985.
- Sh. Munir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- 2. We have heard Sh. Munir Ahmad, learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner in support of this petition. He has not been able to establish that any substantial question of law of public importance is involved in this case. Hence no ground for grant of leave to appeal under Article 212 of the Constitution exists. The petition is dismissed.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal the judgment, dated 1-8-1985 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Lahore in Case No. 115/199 of 1985). --Art. 185(3)--Leave to appeal, grant of--No substantial question of law of public importance being involved, leave to appeal refused
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑The petitioner an ex‑Kanoongo, was removed from service by the District Collector vide order, dated 22‑7‑1985. His appeal to the Commissioner, Multan Division, Multan, was rejected on 7‑1‑1985. He then filed an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal, which too was dismissed vide order, dated 1‑8‑1985. Hence this petition for leave to appeal.
2. We have heard Sh. Munir Ahmad, learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner in support of this petition. He has not been able to establish that any substantial question of law of public importance is involved in this case. Hence no ground for grant of leave to appeal under Article 212 of the Constitution exists. The petition is dismissed. M.I. Petition dismissed.