1983 P Cr (PLP)
KHAN MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus S. H. O., POLICE STATION MANGTANWALA, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1983 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | KHAN MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus S. H. O., POLICE STATION MANGTANWALA, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA AND OTHERS-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (KHAN MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus S. H. O., POLICE STATION MANGTANWALA, DISTRICT SHEIKHUPURA AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Q. M. Salim with Begum Rehana Sarwar for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing : 31st August, 1981.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 154 and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-First Information Report-Registration of-Petitioner directed to appro ach respondent S. H. O. and inform him about commission of cognizable offence-Respondent to act strictly in accordance with law-Petitioner, if not satisfied with action taken by respondent open to repeat prayer for registration of case.-[First Information Report].
Judgment & Decree
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I find that notice was issued to the respondent in compliance with the order passed by this Court on 24th August, 1981 but it is not known whether the notice, in fact, was served upon him or not.
2. The petitioner is directed to approach the S. H. O. and inform him orally or through a written application about the commission of a cognizable offence and the respondent would act strictly in accordance with law. In case the petitioner is not satisfied with the action taken by respondent it would be open to him to repeat his prayer for the registra tion of the case, Petition stands disposed of. Order accordingly.