1991 PLP 262 (SCMR)
GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Respondent
| Citation | 1991 PLP 262 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Naimuddin, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Ajmal Mian, JJ |
| Parties | GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 262 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 262 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Naimuddin, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Ajmal Mian, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 262 (SCMR) (GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Maqbool Hussain Shah, Advocate Supreme Court and Iqbal Ahmad Oureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.
- Bashir Ahmad Ansari, Advocate` Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 5th June, 1990.
- Syed Maqbool Hussain Shah, Advocate Supreme Court and Iqbal Ahmad Oureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.
- Bashir Ahmad Ansari, Advocate` Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
- (iv) Respondents after deposit of the above‑mentioned amount in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bahawalpur, will inform the counsel Syed Maqbool Hussain Shah, Advocate, 10‑Edwards Road, Lahore, and will also supply a photocopy of the challan receipt showing deposit of the above mentioned amount."
Headnotes / Summary
OXXIII, R.3
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)
Parties to appeal had filed joint application containing terms of compromise on which they had settled dispute whereby they prayed that appeal should be disposed of in terms thereof
Terms of compromise appeared to be lawful
Supreme Court recorded the compromise and disposed of appeal in terms thereof.
Judgment & Decree
NAIMUDDIN, J.‑‑‑Learned counsel for the parties have filed a joint application containing the terms of compromise on which they have settled the dispute and whereby they have prayed that the appeal may be disposed of in terms thereof. The terms of compromise read as follows:‑‑ "(i) Respondents will deposit Rs.70,000 (Seventy thousand) within six months in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bahawalpur, which amount will be paid to the appellant by the Court. (ii) The appellant will have no claim over the suit‑property after the receipt of the above‑mentioned amount and the respondents will become full and absolute owners of the suit‑property. (iii) If the respondents fail to deposit the above‑mentioned amount of Rs.70,000 (Seventy thousand) within six months from today, the appeal will stand accepted. (iv) Respondents after deposit of the above‑mentioned amount in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bahawalpur, will inform the counsel Syed Maqbool Hussain Shah, Advocate, 10‑Edwards Road, Lahore, and will also supply a photocopy of the challan receipt showing deposit of the above mentioned amount."
2. The compromise appears to be lawful. We, therefore, record the same and dispose of this appeal in terms thereof with no order as to costs. A.A./G‑303/S Order accordingly,