1986 P Cr (PLP)
JANOO alias JAN MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Abdur Qadeer Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | JANOO alias JAN MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdur Qadeer Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (JANOO alias JAN MUHAMMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307/34‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑No overt act attributed to accused‑‑Mere presence at site without any overt act, held, would not prima facie saddle accused with any criminal liability‑‑Pre‑arrest bail granted. Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicant. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No. 882 of 1985, decided on Ist August, 1985. ‑‑‑S.498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307/34‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑No overt act attributed to accused‑‑Mere presence at site without any overt act, held, would not prima facie saddle accused with any criminal liability‑‑Pre‑arrest bail granted. Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicant. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A.‑G. for the State. The report of the incident was lodged on 8‑7‑1985 wherein it is alleged that the applicant alongwith co‑accused who is his son had attacked the injured Deedar son of the complainant. It is alleged that the applicant was armed with hatchet and the co‑accused was armed with gun. No injury was caused by the present applicant and no overt act has been attributed to him. Mere presence at the site without any overt act does not prima facie saddle him with any criminal liability. He is already admitted to interim bail. The bail is confirmed. H. A. K. Pre‑arrest bail granted.