PCRLJ 1986

1986 P Cr (PLP)

GHULAM NABI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1722/B of 1985, decided on 14th October, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Ruston S. Sidhwa, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ruston S. Sidhwa, J
Parties GHULAM NABI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ruston S. Sidhwa, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (GHULAM NABI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ch. Muhammad Aslam Sandhu for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 14th October, 1985.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 419, 420 & 471‑ Pre‑arrest bail, refusal of‑‑Pre‑arrest interim bail granted to two of accused recalled due to their absence‑‑Case of third accused not found to be fit for grant of pre‑arrest bail‑‑Bail refused. Farrukh Humayyun for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 419, 420 & 471‑ Pre‑arrest bail, refusal of‑‑Pre‑arrest interim bail granted to two of accused recalled due to their absence‑‑Case of third accused not found to be fit for grant of pre‑arrest bail‑‑Bail refused. Ch. Muhammad Aslam Sandhu for Petitioner. Farrukh Humayyun for the State. Date of hearing: 14th October, 1985. Muhammad Hussain and Muhammad Sarwar, petitioners Nos.2 and 3 are absent. Their pre‑arrest bail is cancelled. The order allowing them pre‑arrest interim bail on 15‑7‑1985 is hereby re‑called. They shall be taken into custody.

2. With regard to the case of Ghulam Nabi, petitioner No.1, the arguments have been heard. For reasons given by the learned Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura, I do not consider this to be a fit case‑for grant of pre‑arrest bail. This petition is dismissed. The pre‑arrest bail granted to Ghulam Nabi, petitioner, is hereby re‑called. He shall be taken into custody. H.A.K. Bail dismissed.