2001 P Cr (PLP)
ALLAH DIWAYA‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2001 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Wahid Bux Brohi, J |
| Parties | ALLAH DIWAYA‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Wahid Bux Brohi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 P Cr (PLP) (ALLAH DIWAYA‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S‑13‑D ‑‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑Investigation in the case was complete and the challan had been submitted in the Court‑‑‑Prosecution witnesses being police officials, tampering with the evidence by the accused was not apprehended‑‑‑Offence with which the accused was charged did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑‑Bail was allowed to accused in circumstances. Sanaullah Noor Ghouri for Applicant. Muhammad Ismail Memon for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No. 1308 of 2000, decided on 15th December, 2000. ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S‑13‑D ‑‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑Investigation in the case was complete and the challan had been submitted in the Court‑‑‑Prosecution witnesses being police officials, tampering with the evidence by the accused was not apprehended‑‑‑Offence with which the accused was charged did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑‑Bail was allowed to accused in circumstances. Sanaullah Noor Ghouri for Applicant. Muhammad Ismail Memon for the State. It is the case of prosecution that on 28‑9‑2000 S.H.O. Zahid Hussain of Gizri Police Station alongwith other staff was on patrol when he apprehended the applicant and on his personal search secured a pistol of .30 bore with four live bullets from his possession. Accordingly a case was registered for an offence under section 13‑D of the Arms Ordinance. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned State Counsel. The investigation has been completed and the challan has been submitted in the Court. All the witnesses belong to Police Department, there is no apprehension of tempering with the evidence. The offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. The, application is allowed. The applicant may be released on bail on furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) and' on executing P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.H.Q./A‑107/K Bail allowed.