PCRLJ 1983

1983 PCr (PLP)

FAYYAZ alias MANNAH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2227‑B of 1981, decided on 31st August, 1981.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1983 PCr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Munir Khan, J
Parties FAYYAZ alias MANNAH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PCr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PCr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PCr (PLP) (FAYYAZ alias MANNAH‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

Representation

  • Mian Muhammad Abbas for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ S. 497‑Bail‑Injuries attributed to petitioner simple in nature

Bail allowed. Saleem Shad‑for the State.

Judgment & Decree

This is an application for bail on behalf of Fayyaz alias Mannah in a case under section 307/34, P. P. C. registered at Police Station Ravi Road, Lahore, vide F. I. R.. No. 142 dated 25th June, 1981. The allegations against the petitioner are that he alongwith others in furtherance of their common intention made murderous assault upon Ghulam Abbas. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegations are that he caused simple injury on the person of victim with a chhuri.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the question whether the alleged offence falls within the purview of section 307 or 324, P. P: C. needs serious consideration.

3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application. He submits that it is a case of murderous assault.

4. Be that as it may, the fact remains there that the injury found on the person of victim has been declared simple as admitted by the Sub -Inspector Police Ahmad Nawaz and the learned State counsel. The petitioner is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (rupees ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. Lahore. M.Y.M. Bail granted.