PCRLJ 1986

1986 P Cr (PLP)

ASHIQ HUSSAIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 394/8 of 1985, decided on 30th April, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Sharif, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Sharif, J
Parties ASHIQ HUSSAIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Sharif, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (ASHIQ HUSSAIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • S. Asif Saeed Khosa for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 30th April, 1985.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10, 11 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused with his accomplices abducting daughter of complainant‑‑Abductee after her recovery making statement that she was raped by accused‑-Accused found innocent by two Investigating Officers‑‑Case, held, Was of further probe‑‑Bail allowed. Akbar Farid Khan for the State,

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10, 11 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused with his accomplices abducting daughter of complainant‑‑Abductee after her recovery making statement that she was raped by accused‑-Accused found innocent by two Investigating Officers‑‑Case, held, Was of further probe‑‑Bail allowed. S. Asif Saeed Khosa for Petitioner. Akbar Farid Khan for the State, Date of hearing: 30th April, 1985. This is an application for bail on behalf of the petitioner in a case under section 10/11/16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VII of 1979.

2. According to the facts narrated in the F.I.R Mst. Pathani, the daughter of Allah Bakhsh, the complainant, was married to Wahid Bakhsh son of Lal. She gave birth to female child who is seven years old. Wahid Bakhsh had divorced Mst. Pathani and she was living in her parental home. Ashiq the petitioner wanted to marry Mst. Pathani and the complainant had put forth a demand of an adult female from his side to be married in the family of the complainant: The petitioner could not arrange for the same and with his accompanies while armed with a Sota, is stated to have abducted Mst. Pathani. Mst. Pathani was recovered and she made a statement that she was raped by Muhammad Ashiq.

3. The police record was summoned which shows that the investigation conducted by Abaidullah Khan, S.I., and Ahmad Khan, D.S.P., revealed that the petitioner was innocent. In this manner, it is a case of further probe. I allow bail to the petitioner in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Rajanpur till the disposal of the case against him. H.A.K. Bail allowed.