1992 PLP 789(1) (MLD)
MUHAMMAD YOUNIS‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1992 PLP 789(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Gul Muhammad Khan, CJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YOUNIS‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 789(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 789(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Gul Muhammad Khan, CJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 789(1) (MLD) (MUHAMMAD YOUNIS‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nisar Ahmad Butt for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.426‑‑‑Suspension of sentence during pendency of appeal‑‑‑Accused had been convicted for attempt and no visible signs of bad intention were there‑‑ Accused had already undergone an imprisonment of ten months‑‑‑Sentence of accused was suspended during pendency of appeal and he was released on bail.
Judgment & Decree
It is contended by the learned counsel that the petitioner has beer convicted for attempt, though no visible signs of bad intentions were there. It is further stated that the petitioner has already undergone an imprisonment if 10 months. The contention for bail has merit. The sentences of the petitioner are suspended and he shall be released on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.15,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the, trig Court. H.B.T /601/F.S.C. Sentence suspended