2001 PLP 316 (YLR)
HAJI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 316 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Wahid Bux Brohi, J |
| Parties | HAJI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 316 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 316 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Wahid Bux Brohi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 316 (YLR) (HAJI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Accused had alleged that his arrest was being sought with mala fide intention in order to have him maltreated, tortured and humiliated at the hands of the Police
State Counsel had conceded that case of the accused was identical to the case of co -accused who had been granted bail as the allegations were general in nature
Case being one in which concession of pre-arrest bail could not be withheld, interim bail order was confirmed. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicant. Anwar Ansari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No.243 of 2001, decided on 15th June, 2001.
S. 498
Accused had alleged that his arrest was being sought with mala fide intention in order to have him maltreated, tortured and humiliated at the hands of the Police
State Counsel had conceded that case of the accused was identical to the case of co -accused who had been granted bail as the allegations were general in nature
Case being one in which concession of pre-arrest bail could not be withheld, interim bail order was confirmed. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicant. Anwar Ansari for the State. In paras. Nos.9 and 10 of the application it is alleged that the arrest is being sought with mala fide intention in order to maltreatment, torture and humiliated the applicant at the hands of police. On merits learned State counsel Mr. Anwar Ansari concedes that the case of applicant is identical to the case of co-accused who have been granted bail, as the allegations are general in nature. Indeed, this is a case in which concession of pre-arrest bail may not be withheld. Consequently, the application's allowed and the interim bail is confirmed on same terms. H.B.T./H-45/K Interim bail confirmed.