1989 PLP 4015 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4015 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4015 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4015 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4015 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused empty -handed and in jail for about eleven months‑‑Whether accused facilitated murder to be seen at trial‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Mirza Masud Sadiq for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Ch. Manzoor Hussain for Petitioner. Mirza Masud Sadiq for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in the case registered against him and another under section 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Naddoke, District Sialkot vide F.I.R. No. 35, dated 19‑5‑1988.
2. According to F.I.R. the petitioner while empty‑handed, after raising a Lalkara had felled Ghulam Muhammad (deceased) from the bicycle and taken him into clasp, whereafter his co‑accused Mehnga had fired twice at Ghulam Muhammad, which resulted in his death. Motive for the occurrence, given in the F.I.R. is that the deceased had married Mst. Fatima a divorced sister of Mehnga co‑accused, against the wishes of Mehnga and the petitioner.
3. The petitioner is in jail for the last about eleven months. He was not armed with anything. It will have to be seen at the trial whether the act done by him had facilitated the murder or not? In the circumstances, a case for bail appears to have been made out. This petition is, therefore, allowed, and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs. twenty thousand with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Narowal. S.A./M‑1453/L Bail allowed.