SCMR 1989

1989SCMR1510 (PLP)

MUHAMMAD SADIQ Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR, RESIDUAL PROPERTIES and others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 1041 of 1984, decided on 1st August, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood jan,JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989SCMR1510 (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood jan,JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD SADIQ Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR, RESIDUAL PROPERTIES and others‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR1510 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR1510 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood jan,JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR1510 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SADIQ Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR, RESIDUAL PROPERTIES and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Representation

  • M.Zafar Yasin, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 1st August, 1988.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the judgment of Lahore High Court, dated 5‑7‑84 in W.P. No.1010‑R‑79). ‑‑‑Arts.199 & 185(3)‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑High Court, after taking into consideration the relevant facts and the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Raunak Ali etc. v. Chief Settlement Commissioner and others P L D 1973 S C 236 observed that petitioner was not entitled to invoke the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court and also gave sound reasons for that view‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. Raunak Ali etc. v. Chief Settlement Commissioner and others P L D 1973 S C 236 ref.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑A learned Judge of the Lahore High Court by judgment, dated 5‑7‑84 dismissed the Constitution petition filed by Muhammad Sadiq in which he had prayed for quashment of an order, dated 13‑10‑1979 passed in review by the Administrator, Residual Properties, Multan Division, Multan whereby the case was remanded to the Deputy Administrator, Residual Properties, Multan. The dispute pertained to a building site. The High Court after taking into consideration the relevant facts and the dictum laid down by this Court in the case of Raunaq Ali etc. v. Chief Settlement Commissioner and others (P L D 1973 S C 236) observed that Muhammad Sadiq A was not entitled to invoke the Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. Sound reasons were given by the learned Judge. Therefore, we don't think the petitioner has made out a case for leave to appeal. The petition is accordingly dismissed. M.B.A./M‑843/S Petition dismissed.