1994 P Cr (PLP)
Master MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Master MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (Master MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Sharif Chaudhry for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4-- Bail, grant of
Prima facie in the absence of particularised mala fides of any of the members of the raiding party, recovery of heroin from accused had constituted sufficient ground for believing his involvement in the offence rendering him disentitled to the concession of bail
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.3/4-- Bail, grant of
Prima facie in the absence of particularised mala fides of any of the members of the raiding party, recovery of heroin from accused had constituted sufficient ground for believing his involvement in the offence rendering him disentitled to the concession of bail
Bail was declined to accused accordingly. Muhammad Sharif Chaudhry for Petitioner. Mirza Israr Baig for the State. Date of hearing: 11th December, 1993. Bail was sought in. the case registered vide F.I.R. No.172 of 2-9-1993 under Article 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 at Police Station Wahdat Colony, Lahore alleging recovery of 50 grams of heroin from the petitioner's person a known narcotic trader, by a police patrol around 12-55 p.m. contending lack of association of any public witness with the alleged recovery qua which Chemical Examiner's report is still awaited and with the submission of challan is no more required for investigation.
2. Prima facie in the absence of particularised mala fides with any of the members of the raiding party, the complained of recovery constitutes sufficient ground for believing petitioner's involvement in the offence charged renders him disentitled to the sought for concession.
3. Conversely the interest of justice would seem to be better served if the case is expeditiously concluded. Consequently declining bail the learned trial Court seized of the matter is required to conclude the proceedings by the end of February, 1994 furnishing report thereof to the Registry. N.H.Q./M-1391/L Bail declined.