2009 PLP (Trib (PTD)
N/A
| Citation | 2009 PLP (Trib (PTD) |
| Forum / Court | Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Syed Nadeem Saqlain, Judicial Member and Mrs. Zareen Saleem Ansari, Accountant Member |
| Parties | N/A |
| Primary Law | Income Tax |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP (Trib (PTD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Income Tax as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP (Trib (PTD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan bench comprising: Syed Nadeem Saqlain, Judicial Member and Mrs. Zareen Saleem Ansari, Accountant Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP (Trib (PTD) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Tahir Ansari, I.T.P. for Appellant.
- Dr. Abdul Sattar Abbasi, D.R. for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Identical Issues
Appeals
Setting aside of
Since the issues involved in the appeals were almost identical to the issues agitated in other appeals and appeals in those cases had already been remanded for de novo assessment
Order passed by the First Appellate Authority in the appeal were also directed to be vacated and the present appeals were also sent back to the assessing authority for fresh assessment.
Judgment & Decree
Titled appeal in respect of tax year 2004-2005 have been directed at the instance of the taxpayer/Appellant, calling in question the impugned order dated 13-11-2006, passed by the learned C.I.T.(A), Hyderabad Zone, Hyderabad.
2. We have heard the learned representatives of both the parties and have also perused the impugned order of the learned C.I.T.(A) and the assessment order.
3. Since the issues involved in the present appeals are almost identical to the issues agitated in I.T.A. No.47 & 48/KB/2007 and I.T.A. No.17 & 18/KB/2007 (Tax year 2004-2005) and the fact that the appeals in those cases have already been remanded for 'de nove assessment, order passed by the learned C.I.T. (A) in the present appeals are also directed to be vacated, and the present appeals are also sent back to the assessing authority for fresh assessment. C.M.A./80/Tax(Trib.) Order accordingly.