1986 PLP 1101(1) (MLD)
ABDUR RAZZAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1101(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | ABDUR RAZZAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1101(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1101(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1101(1) (MLD) (ABDUR RAZZAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim for Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑5.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.12‑‑Cgmplainant and other witnesses though related to victim, swearing affidavits in favour of accused‑‑All such persons confirming affidavits in Court‑‑Case, held, was of further inquiry, accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Abdul Rashid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑5.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.12‑‑Cgmplainant and other witnesses though related to victim, swearing affidavits in favour of accused‑‑All such persons confirming affidavits in Court‑‑Case, held, was of further inquiry, accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Altaf Ibrahim for Petitioner Abdul Rashid for the State. The petitioner stands charged under Article 12 of the Offence of Zina (E.O.H) Ordinance VII of 1979 on the allegation of committing sodomy with Shaukat Ali. Muhammad Aslam, Muhammad Akbar and Muhammad Younas had seen the petitioner running away from Barseem field soon after the occurrence. .
2. Bail is claimed on the ground that the petitioner had been involved on account of some misunderstanding and the P.Ws. could not identify him because his back was towards them. Muhammad Aslam who : complainant in the case and cousin of the victim, his brother Muhammad Younas and their sister's husband Muhammad Akbar who are named as witnesses in the F.I.R. have sworn affidavits in favour of the petitioner. All of them are present in the Court and confirm the genuineness o the contents of the affidavits sworn by them.
3. In the above circumstances, it is a case of further enquiry. Accordingly, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Pakpattan. S.A. Bail accepted.