1994 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SIBTAIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.4
Solitary public witness had sworn an affidavit denying the recovery of heroin from the possession of the accused, all the other witnesses were of Excise and Police Department
Accused who was first offender was behind the bars for almost an year without any progress in the trial
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.4
Solitary public witness had sworn an affidavit denying the recovery of heroin from the possession of the accused, all the other witnesses were of Excise and Police Department
Accused who was first offender was behind the bars for almost an year without any progress in the trial
Bail was allowed to accused in circumstances. Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi for Petitioner. Nafees Ahmad Ansari, A.A: G. for the State. Muhammad Sibtain petitioner was arrested on 24-3-1990 and 20 grams of heroin was recovered from his possession.
2. Bail is urged on the grounds that the only public witness namely Muhammad Afzal has sworn an affidavit to the effect that no heroin was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. All the other witnesses are of Excise and Police Department.
3. The petitioner is stated to be a first offender, the alleged recovery has already been effected and he is behind the bars since 24-3-1990 without any progress in the trial. Accordingly, I admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.15,000 with two sureties ire the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. N.I3.Q./M-1823/L Bail granted.