1990 PLP 438 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD JAVED MUGHAL‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION
| Citation | 1990 PLP 438 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD JAVED MUGHAL‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION |
| Primary Law | Civil service‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 438 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 438 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 438 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD JAVED MUGHAL‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th July, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 7‑6‑1981, in Appeal No.23/821 of 1980). ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑Service Tribunal's observation about civil servant was that he was given ample opportunity to resume duty but he chose to remain absent‑‑Civil servant could not give any satisfactory reply to the observation of Service Tribunal‑‑No ground for ]cave to appeal was thus made out‑‑Leave refused.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Muhammad Javed Mughal has filed this petition for leave to appeal against the order of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 7‑6‑1981. We called upon the learned counsel as to what has he to say about the observation of the Tribunal that "the appellant was given ample opportunity to resume duty but he chose to remain absent". The counsel could not give any satisfactory reply. No ground for leave to appeal is made out. A.A./M‑964/S Leave refused.