SCMR 1988

1988 PLP 1988 (SCMR)

Syed KABIR AHMAD BUKHARI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No.6-R of 1988, decided on 2nd October, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Aslam Riaz Hussain,
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1988 PLP 1988 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Aslam Riaz Hussain,
Parties Syed KABIR AHMAD BUKHARI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1988 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1988 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Aslam Riaz Hussain,.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1988 (SCMR) (Syed KABIR AHMAD BUKHARI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Aziz A. Munshi, Attorney-General and Ch. Fazal-e-Hussain, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 2nd October, 1988.
  • Dr. A. Basit, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record of Petitioner.
  • Aziz A. Munshi, Attorney‑General and Ch. Fazal‑e‑Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Art.184 (3)--Constitutional petition--No violation of any fundamental right was alleged for whose enforcement the jurisdiction of Supreme Court could be invoked under Art. 184(3)--Petition dismissed. Dr. A. Basit, Advocate Supreme Court and Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record of Petitioner.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑No violation of any fundamental right is alleged for whose enforcement the jurisdiction of this Court can be invoked under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as being incompetent. M.B.A./K‑77/S Petition dismissed.