1995 P Cr (PLP)
Mst. TAJ MERAL — Petitioner Versus Haji KARIM KHAN — Respondent
| Citation | 1995 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. TAJ MERAL — Petitioner Versus Haji KARIM KHAN — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. TAJ MERAL — Petitioner Versus Haji KARIM KHAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rana Abdul Majid for Petitioner.
- Mian Muhammad Abbas for Respondent.
- 5. Issue notice to Rana Abdul Majeed, Advocate 38-Nabha Road, Lahore, to show cause as to why proceedings under section 228, Cr.P.C. read with Article 204 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan and section 3 of Contempt of Court Act be not initiated against him. Reply to be filed within three days. .
Headnotes / Summary
S. 491
Police Officer who was directed to recover and produce the alleged detenus in Court had expressed his inability to do so despite his having made all efforts in this regard
Serious allegation of abduction had been levelled against the respondent and the petitioner could, if so advised, approach the S.H.O. concerned who in turn was directed to record the petitioner's statement under S.154, Cr.P.C. and proceed in the matter in accordance with law
Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Rana Abdul Majid for Petitioner. Mian Muhammad Abbas for Respondent. Mst. Taj Mehal, petitioner, earlier filed Criminal Miscellaneous No.995/H of 1994 in this Court which was dismissed for want of sufficient particulars of the alleged abductor.
2. This is second petition in this Court. On 4-12-1994, S.H.O. Police Station RA. Bazar, Lahore was directed to recover the alleged detenus and A produce them before this Court on 19-12-1994. The S.H.O. is present. He states that he made all his efforts for the recovery of the alleged detenus but without success.
3. Serious allegation of abduction has been levelled against the respondent. The petitioner may, if so advised, approach the S.H.O. Police Station RA. Bazar, Lahore Cantt. who in turn is directed to record the statement of the petitioner under section 154, Cr.P.C. and proceed in the matter in accordance with law. With these directions, this petition stands disposed of.
4. During the course of hearing, it was announced that the order would be made at 1 p.m. On this learned counsel for the petitioner started shouting and stressed that the order should be announced just now. I told the learned counsel that after going through the previous petition and in order to save the public time, the orders will be made at 1 p.m. but the attitude of the counsel was again the same. I warned him not to repeat such words and stress upon the Court. At this stage learned counsel who were present in the Court stood up and apologised on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner. Even then learned counsel for the petitioner kept on shouting and pressing the Court for announcement of the order just now. The counsel was again warned but he uttered that "I am ready to face the contempt proceedings". The attitude and conduct of the learned counsel was derogatory and amounted to interference into process of the Court.
5. Issue notice to Rana Abdul Majeed, Advocate 38-Nabha Road, Lahore, to show cause as to why proceedings under section 228, Cr.P.C. read with Article 204 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan and section 3 of Contempt of Court Act be not initiated against him. Reply to be filed within three days. .
6. The contempt matter now to come up on 22-12-1994. O.S.D.(Judl.) will ensure service of the notice Dasti today. N.H.Q./T-98/L Order accordingly.