2001 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
FAZAL ILLAHI and others Versus P.T.C. and others
| Citation | 2001 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | FAZAL ILLAHI and others Versus P.T.C. and others |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (FAZAL ILLAHI and others Versus P.T.C. and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Haider Chacher, Assistant Director, STR V, Sukkur for Respondents.
- A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners (in C.Ps. Nos.311-K, 312-K, 313-K, 314-K, 315-K, 351-K and 352-K of 1998).
- Raja Haq Nawaz, Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Ghaury, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents (in C-Ps. Nos.351-K and 352-R of 1998).
- Muhammad Mushaffy Ahmed, Deputy Manager, Pakistan Steels for Respondent (in Remaining Petitions).
- Nema for Respondent (in C.P. No. 328-K of 1998).
- M.L. Shahani, Advocate Supreme Court and N.C. Motiani, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No. 339-K of 1998).
- Nemo for Respondent (in C P. No. 339-K of 1998).
- Mehmood Khan, Superintendent, PAEC for Respondents (in C.Ps. Nos. 359-K, 360-K, 361-K, 370-K and 371-K of 1998).
- A. Aziz Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent (in C.P. No. 362-K of 1998).
- M.M. Haque, Advocate Supreme Court and Faizanul Haque, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No.337-K of 1998).
- S. Hassan Munawar, Assistant Manager Law for Respondent (in C. P. No. 377-K of 1998).
- R.A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in C.P. No.383-K of 1998).
- Nemo for Respondent (in C.P. No. 383-K of 1998).,
- Nemo for Respondent (in C.P. No. 388-K of 1998).
- Muhammad Aslam Rao, Resident Director for Respondent (in C.P. No.462-K of 1998).
- Nemo for Respondent (in C.P. No. 474-K of 1998).
- M.S. Ghaury, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent (in C.P. No. 479-K of 1998).
- Nemo for Respondent (in C.P. No. 552-K of 1998).
- Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1998.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeals from the judgment dated 25-2-1998 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Camp at Karachi, passed in Appeal No.690-K of 1997 and other connected appeals).
Art. 212(3)
Petitions for leave to appeal
Conversion in appeals-- Delay
Supreme Court converted petitions for leave to appeal into appeals and remanded cases to Service Tribunal fo7 fresh decision
Some of petitions for leave to appeal were time-barred, but as all cases had been remanded, delay in said petitions was also condoned. Petitioners in person (in C.Ps. Nos.259-K, 288-K to 295-K of 1998). Petitioners in person (in C.Ps. Nos. 332-K, 340-K, 342-K, 364-K, 375-K, 381-K and 529-K of 1998). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 328-K of 1998). Petitioners in person (in C Ps, . Nos. 359-K, 360-K, 361-K, 370-K and 371-K of 1998). Petitioner in person (in C P. No. 362-K of 1998). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 388-K of 1998). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 462-K of 1998). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 474-K of 1998). Petitioner in person (in C.P. No. 479-K of 1998). Petitioner in, person (in C.P. No. 552-K of 1998).
Judgment & Decree
AJMAL MIAN, C.J.
The above petitions have been filed against various judgments of the Federal Service Tribunal but all are based on the judgment dated 26-12-1997, passed in Appeal No. 2638(K) of 1997. The aforesaid judgment has been subject-matter of appeal inter alia in Civil Petition No. 1305-K of 1997 (Syed Aftab Ahmed v. K.E.S.C.) decided on 16-4-1998 by a Bench of this Court comprising two of us (Ajmal Mian, C.J. and Mamoon Kazi, J.), and Saiduzzaman Siddiqui, J., whereby we converted the above petitions into appeals and remanded the cases to the Service Tribunal for fresh decision on the appeals in the light of the observations contained in the above judgment.
2. In the present set-of petitions, C.P. No. 370-K of 1998, C.P. No.529-K of 1998 and C.P. No. 552-K of 1998 are barred by time by 10 days, 91 days and 48 days respectively. However, since we are remanding the other cases, we condone the delay in the above petitions,
3. The above petitions are converted into appeals and they are remanded to the Service Tribunal in terms of the above judgment dated 16-4-1998 passed in Civil Petition No. 1305-K of 1997 and other connected petitions, The aforesaid judgment dated 16-4-1998 may be read as a part of this Order. Leave petitions converted into appeals and appeals allowed. H.B.T./F-21/S Appeals allowed.