PCRLJ 1987

1987 P Cr (PLP)

ZAKAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3451/B of 1986, decided on 26th January, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, C J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, C J
Parties ZAKAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, C J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (ZAKAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Khurshid Alam for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Delay in trial‑‑Accused behind bars for more than one year‑‑Accused, held, was entitled to concession of bail on ground of delay in trial‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Rafi Siddiqui for the State. Farooq Bedar, A . A . ‑G . for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Delay in trial‑‑Accused behind bars for more than one year‑‑Accused, held, was entitled to concession of bail on ground of delay in trial‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Khurshid Alam for Petitioner. Rafi Siddiqui for the State. Farooq Bedar, A . A . ‑G . for the State. The first application moved by the petitioner was dismissed by me by order, dated 24‑3‑1986 on the ground that the Additional Sessions Judge had given direction the trial Court to conclude the trial within four months, which has not been done so far. The incident took place on 22‑9‑1985. Since then the petitioner is behind the bars. I think he is entitled to the concession of bail on 1A the short ground of delay. I, therefore, admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C . Faisalabad. S.A./Z‑2/L Bail granted.