1981 PLP 1552 (CLC)
FARAH DEEBA‑Petitioner Versus THE KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, KARACHI
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1552 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hafeez Memon and S. A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | FARAH DEEBA‑Petitioner Versus THE KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, KARACHI |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (11973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1552 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (11973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1552 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Hafeez Memon and S. A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1552 (CLC) (FARAH DEEBA‑Petitioner Versus THE KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, KARACHI). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ali Sayeed for Petitioner.
- Muslim Naqvi for Respondent No. 1.
- Waheed Farooqui for Respondent No. 2.
- Date of hearing : 2nd December, 1979.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ Art. 199 read with West Pakistan Municipal Committee (Recovery of Taxes) Rules, 1962, r. 10‑Bid sheet of auction of property of petitioner showing only four persons participating and their addresses vague‑Manner in which name of alleged owner of property men tioned in records of Corporation remaining shrouded in mystery and no explanation offered on behalf of Corporation‑Auction also Suffering from other patent infirmities on account of non‑compliance of provisions of r. 10‑‑Auotionof petitioner's property, held, illegal and set aside, in circumstances. Bashir Ahmad v. Rashid Ehsan and 4 others P L I) 1979 Lah, 116 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Constitutional Petition No. D‑947 of 1977, decided on 2nd December, 1979. ‑‑ Art. 199 read with West Pakistan Municipal Committee (Recovery of Taxes) Rules, 1962, r. 10‑Bid sheet of auction of property of petitioner showing only four persons participating and their addresses vague‑Manner in which name of alleged owner of property men tioned in records of Corporation remaining shrouded in mystery and no explanation offered on behalf of Corporation‑Auction also Suffering from other patent infirmities on account of non‑compliance of provisions of r. 10‑‑Auotionof petitioner's property, held, illegal and set aside, in circumstances. Bashir Ahmad v. Rashid Ehsan and 4 others P L I) 1979 Lah, 116 ref. Muhammad Ali Sayeed for Petitioner. Muslim Naqvi for Respondent No.
1. Waheed Farooqui for Respondent No.