2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
PUNJAB TEACHERS UNION, DISTRICT SIALKOT Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Secretariat Punjab, Lahore and 6 others
| Citation | 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | PUNJAB TEACHERS UNION, DISTRICT SIALKOT Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Secretariat Punjab, Lahore and 6 others |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (PUNJAB TEACHERS UNION, DISTRICT SIALKOT Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat, Secretariat Punjab, Lahore and 6 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Noor Muhammad Awan for Petitioner.
- Maqbool Elahi Malik, A.-G., Punjab along with M. Bilal Khan A.A.-G., Punjab, with Miss Shama Zia, S.O., Litigation for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 12th August, 2002.
- Maqbool Elahi Malik, A.‑G., Punjab along with M. Bilal Khan A.A.‑G., Punjab, with Miss Shama Zia, S.O., Litigation for Respondents.
- 2. Learned Advocate General, Punjab on instructions states that the petitioners will be treated in accordance with the rules and their promotion chances, according to the quota, will not affect the same pertaining to their cadre.
- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners due to the statement made by the learned Advocate General. Punjab is satisfied and does not press this petition, which is disposed of accordingly.
Headnotes / Summary
Contention of civil servants was that all appointments made on contract basis would usurp their right of promotion
Authority stated that civil servants would be treated in accordance with rules and their promotion chances according to quota, pertaining to their cadre would not be affected-- Civil servants on such assurance by Authority were satisfied and did not press the petition which was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑Promotion‑‑‑Contention of civil servants was that all appointments made on contract basis would usurp their right of promotion‑‑‑Authority stated that civil servants would be treated in accordance with rules and their promotion chances according to quota, pertaining to their cadre would not be affected‑‑ Civil servants on such assurance by Authority were satisfied and did not press the petition which was disposed of accordingly. Malik Noor Muhammad Awan for Petitioner. Maqbool Elahi Malik, A.‑G., Punjab along with M. Bilal Khan A.A.‑G., Punjab, with Miss Shama Zia, S.O., Litigation for Respondents. Date of hearing: 12th August, 2002. This order will dispose of Writ Petition No. 13448 of 2002 and 12993 of 2002 filed by Punjab Teachers Union according to which all the appointments on contract basis will usurp the right of promotion and they will affect the same.
2. Learned Advocate General, Punjab on instructions states that the petitioners will be treated in accordance with the rules and their promotion chances, according to the quota, will not affect the same pertaining to their cadre.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners due to the statement made by the learned Advocate General. Punjab is satisfied and does not press this petition, which is disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./P‑123/L Order accordingly.