1986 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUR RAHIM alias RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J |
| Parties | ABDUR RAHIM alias RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUR RAHIM alias RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sultan Alam for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly received money each from three witnesses for their visit to Saudi Arabia‑‑Visa entries ultimately found to have been forged‑‑Witnesses deported to Pakistan from Jeddah‑‑Two witnesses gave affidavits rebutting allegations against accused‑‑Accused in judicial lock‑up since about seven months and no longer required for investigation‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Sh. Nazir Alam for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 482/B of 1985, decided on 1st June, 1985. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly received money each from three witnesses for their visit to Saudi Arabia‑‑Visa entries ultimately found to have been forged‑‑Witnesses deported to Pakistan from Jeddah‑‑Two witnesses gave affidavits rebutting allegations against accused‑‑Accused in judicial lock‑up since about seven months and no longer required for investigation‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Sultan Alam for Petitioner. Sh. Nazir Alam for the State. This is a petition for bail on behalf of Abdur Rahim. It is alleged that he received Rs.8,000 per head from Bahadur Khan, Ghulam Hussain and Habib Ullah to facilitate their visit to Saudi Arabia on some job but when they reached Jeddah Airport, it transpired that the visa entries were forged. All the three persons accordingly came back to Pakistan in 1979. On 21‑1‑1981, the present case was registered by Wahid Bakhsh, Assistant Director, F.I.A. on secret information.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel that Bahadur and Ghulam Hussain have sworn affidavits rebutting the allegations against the petitioner. It is further contended that the petitioner is in judicial lock‑up for the last about seven months and is no longer required for purposes of investigation. The learned State counsel has opposed this petition. In view of the affidavits of Bahadur and Ghulam Hussain and the fact that the person of the petitioner is no longer required for further investigation, the petitioner is allowed bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, D.G. Khan. S.A. Bail accepted.